|
Stay in touch!
Search with
Archives
July 2010
June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003
Recent Entries
Part 1 Summary
The technological Gypsy Tap The audience is listening (and buying) Edison and Tom Anderson were blind and dumb Thanks for nothing, Anne! It’s not about you, it’s about me … Let’s come together and sing His praises Ancients, Aborigines and Africans How NOT to impress music-business decision makers Pulling the wool over the sheep's eyes |
July 26, 2010The technological Gypsy TapJust as recordings sales were peaking in the late 1990s, production and distribution technologies were becoming accessible to the general public. Compact ADCs, MIDI devices, sample libraries, CD burners in the home and in cheaper manufacturing plants, the hypertext transfer and file transfer protocols, increased computer processing power and open-source software all conspired to reduce the cost of producing and distributing an album of recorded music to within the range of many acts who previously needed a record company's venture capital and marketing networks. This meant that the large corporations were no longer the only ones who could afford the technologies of production and distribution, and hence no longer controlled the flow of content into the market. Now nearly anyone who wanted to could use their music to sell technology. The general public now had a much wider range of musics that could be their cultural glue and pump their social gonads. The new musics were available at a much lower price than the large companies' and people were better able to choose the glue for their particular culture. A similar change in the economies of production and distribution occurred with regard to combining music and video, along with peer-to-peer technologies. Now there were an almost infinite number of MTV channels. The large companies retain their marketing networks and the budgets to develop high-quality musical 'product'. They are still dominant forces in the music market. But now there is very little stopping competitors from doing the same thing ... Summary:
This post is one section of Part 1 of Dr Huge's "How the record industry got it so wrong". To download the current draft of the book in PDF format, click here.
Posted by DrHuge at July 26, 2010 3:24 PM
| TrackBack
Comments
Post a comment
|
Categories
Huge's music!
The Genre Benders: I am leaving! I am leaving! in original CD format or download from iTunes or listen on PayPlay.fm or Go to The Genre Benders' home page for more merchandise - support Huge's bid to create new and interesting music in new and interesting ways with new and interesting people. ![]() Bun' Ber E Unplugged in original CD format or download from MP3tunes.com or Go to Bun' Ber E's home page for more Bun' Ber E's debut CD
in original CD format or one track at a time or from or Read some reviews or Go to Bun' Ber E's home page for more |