|
Stay in touch!
Search with
Archives
June 2010
May 2010 April 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003
Recent Entries
Never a truer word spoken ...
16 Answers from an Entrepreneur and Freelancer A good digital music strategy? You bet! May update Breaking an act ... Things Indies can learn from Idol ... The Melbourne Storm fiasco cont ... The Melbourne Storm fiasco How to make a viny record - from 1956 It's better to reliquish control; Kulash gets it. Why doesn't EMI? |
October 19, 2005Why stick to just one approach?Watched the final episode of The Hit Game last night and it drove home to me yet another aspect of what's wrong with the music industry: The fixation with making artists stick to one "brand" of music. I thought the Unplugged phenomenon had thrown that notion out years ago ... Last night Bazz, the music producer, was faced wih a conundrum. He had these three incredibly talented girls who could sing in harmony like angels and had produced a techno-R&B-ish demo. But he heard them singing together around the piano and wanted to showcase their ability. What a perfect solution!! Show them doing it the way they learned (and they were good!!). But the faceless dream factory executives were confused. What was this band about? Were they an R&B/pop act or an accoustic act? Since they obviously had no comprehension of how music works (much less what makes it good) they just didn't get it! And, worse, they assumed the fans wouldn't get it either. I got it, the girls got it, Bazz the producer got it ... but the people who held the future of this act in their hands simply got confused when faced with the genuine article ... What's wrong with the girls doing it both ways? That's the greater musical challenge and appeals to twice the market. I think it's brilliant they can do it - Lush had the opposite problem, being unable to perform away from the studio. The gentle irony here is that these people obviously haven't learned from the one of the great successes of the 1990s: the Unplugged album. Clapton, Nirvana, Kiss and more, all unplugged their instuments and played accoustic versions of their hits, proving that a great song is a great song no matter how it's played. Let them sing their songs as many ways as possible. That's what I'm working on! First demo coming out soon. Posted by Huge at October 19, 2005 5:35 PMComments
Post a comment
|
Categories
Support independent music!
The Genre Benders: I am leaving! I am leaving! in original CD format or download from iTunes or listen on PayPlay.fm or Go to The Genre Benders' home page for more
merchandise - support Huge's bid to create new and interesting music in new and interesting ways with new and interesting people. Bun' Ber E Unplugged in original CD format or download from MP3tunes.com or Go to Bun' Ber E's home page for more Bun' Ber E's debut CD in original CD format or one track at a time or from or Read some reviews or Go to Bun' Ber E's home page for more |